And since there are new possibilities that come along for the ride, I'm exploring the options that the new functionality gives me.The web app manages sharing snippets, which are organized by type and use icons to identify additional characteristics, like globally shared.įor details about core features in TextExpander, consult TextExpander is one of those core applications I incorporate into a lot of other tools. There's enough added value in the new version and consistency in pricing (for me) to convince me to buy in. With all of this in mind, I'm happy with my choice to upgrade to the new TextExpander even if I choose not to use the sharing features. I haven't tried it yet, but I'm looking for the opportunity. Anytime there are communications, blocks of text, or forms that are used by multiple people, this could save us all a lot of time. I can see a lot of value in sharing email templates with clients or for Bookworm. It makes it possible to retrieve the info I want without a software installation.Īnd the feature I'm considering is the one that initiated this whole thing: teams and sharing. I don't want TextExpander on it for other reasons but it's incredibly handy to log on to the website to access that data. If you have the apps, why would you use the website? Then I ran into a couple instances where I wanted a block of text from TextExpander while on a different profile on my computer. I find the need to alter abbreviations every few months which means the inline search ability has received a lot of my attention. Since we typically have these memorized it may not sound very useful until you consider the pain of changing your snippet abbreviations or a database with hundreds of snippets. You type a keyword anywhere, hit a keyboard shortcut (that you can customize), and see search results of your matching snippets. But then I tried the trial and found two features that are important to me and a third I'm considering. What's new that would lead me to upgrade? I didn't have an answer. My big question when I first saw the release of the new TextExpander was about features. By adopting this recurring payment structure, I get no-hassle updates without the worry. If you look at it from a high-level, I am effectively paying a subscription plan already. Any time these tools have an upgrade available, I like to jump on it quickly. I deliberately limit the number of tools I use, which means I pick quality, pro-user tools with a lot of features and flexibility. SubscriptionĪnymore I'm slow to upgrade hardware. In the end, that means I'm paying no more than I have in the past. Since release, Smile listened to the flood of feedback and generously implemented a 50% upgrade discount for life. Year-over-year, the price to me would increase almost twofold. I already use the backend for other software and services like OmniFocus, Workflow, and Overcast. I understand the concern over data control here but it really doesn't apply to me. The new version forces you to use as the backend. Previously, we used DropBox or some other syncing service to host and update our snippets as we alter them. One of the big complaints is the location used for data storage and syncing. However, if I look at the new version without allowing my previous experience to color my opinion, it is striking how similar it is to my other choices for software. To be completely honest, I was confused by and resistant to the change at the onset. When Smile introduced the new "Snippet As A Service" version of TextExpander, there was quite an outcry.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |